To identify and assess the dependency and power of different stakeholders in a conflict.
List the offers and demands made to date. It can be useful to have this in snapshot form; some parties will use a table, chart or timeline. Describe the negotiation strategy you have followed up to this point. How would you characterize your negotiating style? Based solely on the positions taken by you Conflict analysis the other party to date, what do you see as the current zone of possible agreement ZOPA for resolving the conflict Further Questions: Have the principals met to discuss the conflict?
Why have the discussions not resulted in a settlement yet? If there is currently an impasse, how have you contributed to it? Has the other side engaged in any tactics that are of concern to you? Which side has been more amenable to working out an agreement?
Which side has dominated the negotiation? Have your discussions been interest-based or positional? Have you communicated your needs and priorities to the other side? Has the other side communicated its needs and priorities to you?
These are distinct from — and generally unrelated to — any demands and offers that have been made by either side. Identify as many of your main interests as possible. List some options will meet your interests and those of the other side. In setting an agenda for the mediation, what are your top priorities?
Identify the one thing you want to make absolutely certain is addressed in the mediation. Where are the pressures to settle or not settle coming from? Identify the major stakeholders e. Which of these speak with the loudest voice? How are the stakeholders affected by the conflict? How will they be affected by the settlement?
Are there pressures to settle or not settle the dispute form any of these constituencies? Is there any conflict within your organization regarding how the case should be resolved? Is there a clear consensus?
Does anyone have veto power over the terms of a mediated agreement? Are there other current conflicts between the parties?CONFLICT ANALYSIS TOOLS TOOL 1: THE CONFLICT WHEEL Description: The conﬂ ict wheel is a “meta” conﬂ ict analysis tool, introducing the others tools.
Each of the six sections of the wheel can be further ana-lysed using tools presented below (or references to . This document contains a series of tools and techniques that will help you analyze your conflict prior to the mediation.
Some of the sections simply call for identifying issues, while others involve a more rigorous analysis. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the conflict analysis is to analyse the conflict occured to the both parties.
Other than that, I want to give the awareness to the society on how some unaccidentally scene could be the causes of the conflict.
Conflict analysis is at the core of conflict-sensitive programming. It is the systematic study of the profile, causes, actors and dynamics of a conflict.
Conflict analysis can be carried out at various levels (e.g. local, regional, national, etc.) and seeks to establish the links between these levels.
CONFLICT ANALYSIS TOOLS TOOL 1: THE CONFLICT WHEEL Description: The conﬂ ict wheel is a “meta” conﬂ ict analysis tool, introducing the others tools.
Each of the six sections of the wheel can be further ana-lysed using tools presented below (or references to . This course provides an introduction to the theory and practice of conflict analysis by illustrating analytical tools used, with reference to two extended case studies, the .