Indeed, looking at his self portraits, we discover the handsome man he was, with his face reflecting the purity of his soul and his intelligence. Self-Portrait, - Detail Museo del Prado, Madrid His contemporaries were impressed by his physical appearance, and his mental and moral qualities, which were no less remarkable. He studied the art principles, made rigorous theoretical observations, meticulously recorded the results of his investigations, and then he gave the resulting written instructions to his contemporaries. In the 16th Century, the city was the chief centre of the German artistic life.
Shall we look to Abraham, the great patriarch, who slept with his servant when he discovered his beloved wife Sarah was infertile? Or to Jacob, who fathered children with four different women two sisters and their servants?
Abraham, Jacob, David, Solomon and the kings of Judah and Israel—all these fathers and heroes were polygamists. The New Testament model of marriage is hardly better. Jesus himself was single and preached an indifference to earthly attachments—especially family.
The apostle Paul also single regarded marriage as an act of last resort for those unable to contain their animal lust. Would any contemporary heterosexual married couple—who likely woke up on their wedding day harboring some optimistic and newfangled ideas about gender equality and romantic love—turn to the Bible as a how-to script?
Of course not, yet the religious opponents of gay marriage would have it be so. The battle over gay marriage has been waged for more than a decade, but within the last six months—since California legalized gay marriage and then, with a ballot initiative in November, amended its Constitution to prohibit it—the debate has grown into a full-scale war, with religious-rhetoric slinging to match.
Not sincewhen the country's pulpits were full of preachers pronouncing on slavery, pro and con, has one of our basic social and economic institutions been so subject to biblical scrutiny.
But whereas in the Civil War the traditionalists had their James Henley Thornwell—and the advocates for change, their Henry Ward Beecher—this time the sides are unevenly matched.
Marriage then and now. Elliott Pearce | Sunday, April 14, Opponents of gay marriage have often protested that allowing gays to marry will constitute a backdoor “redefinition” of marriage. However, I believe Western societies have already substantially redefined marriage over the past 60 years. I hope to provide some necessary context. Jun 07, · They then either adjust or divorce. We, on the other hand, cannot say the same because we were strangers at our nuptials and so did not know whom we were getting into bed with (literally). Half a century ago, adulthood in America came along with marriage, then a home, then children, in that order, with women typically marrying before they turned Now, many women are finding.
All the religious rhetoric, it seems, has been on the side of the gay-marriage opponents, who use Scripture as the foundation for their objections.
The argument goes something like this statement, which the Rev. The church cannot condone or bless same-sex marriages because this stands in opposition to Scripture and our tradition.
First, while the Bible and Jesus say many important things about love and family, neither explicitly defines marriage as between one man and one woman.
And second, as the examples above illustrate, no sensible modern person wants marriage—theirs or anyone else's —to look in its particulars anything like what the Bible describes. As a civil institution, marriage offers practical benefits to both partners: As a religious institution, marriage offers something else: In a religious marriage, two people promise to take care of each other, profoundly, the way they believe God cares for them.
Biblical literalists will disagree, but the Bible is a living document, powerful for more than 2, years because its truths speak to us even as we change through history.
In that light, Scripture gives us no good reason why gays and lesbians should not be civilly and religiously married—and a number of excellent reasons why they should.
In the Old Testament, the concept of family is fundamental, but examples of what social conservatives would call "the traditional family" are scarcely to be found. Marriage was critical to the passing along of tradition and history, as well as to maintaining the Jews' precious and fragile monotheism.
But as the Barnard University Bible scholar Alan Segal puts it, the arrangement was between "one man and as many women as he could pay for. The fact that homosexual couples cannot procreate has also been raised as a biblical objection, for didn't God say, "Be fruitful and multiply"?
But the Bible authors could never have imagined the brave new world of international adoption and assisted reproductive technology—and besides, heterosexuals who are infertile or past the age of reproducing get married all the time.
Ozzie and Harriet are nowhere in the New Testament either. The biblical Jesus was—in spite of recent efforts of novelists to paint him otherwise—emphatically unmarried. He preached a radical kind of family, a caring community of believers, whose bond in God superseded all blood ties.
Leave your families and follow me, Jesus says in the gospels. There will be no marriage in heaven, he says in Matthew. Jesus never mentions homosexuality, but he roundly condemns divorce leaving a loophole in some cases for the husbands of unfaithful women.
The apostle Paul echoed the Christian Lord's lack of interest in matters of the flesh.
For him, celibacy was the Christian ideal, but family stability was the best alternative. Marry if you must, he told his audiences, but do not get divorced. If the bible doesn't give abundant examples of traditional marriage, then what are the gay-marriage opponents really exercised about?
Well, homosexuality, of course—specifically sex between men. Sex between women has never, even in biblical times, raised as much ire.I was standing at the entrance of a swanky bar on an unremarkable Wednesday night in September the first time I saw the light hit his face.
Every cell in my.
Apr 15, · Yes, really. While the Supreme Court and the rest of us are all focused on the human right of marriage equality, let’s not forget that the fight doesn’t end with same-sex marriage.
A marriage then became more inclusive: a contract between two consenting adults of the same race and of opposite gender. In , again over the objections of about 70% of the population at the time, mixed-race couples were permitted to marry.
Essay on We Need Same-sex Marriage Now Words | 6 Pages We Need Same-sex Marriage Now Known to some people as a lifetime commitment of devotion, to others a promise to reside with a stranger, and even to some people as a union arranged by their parents, marriage is a widely varying ritual practiced all over the world.
Marriage in the Roman Catholic Church, also called matrimony, is the "covenant by which a man and a woman establish between themselves a partnership of the whole of life and which is ordered by its nature to the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring", and which "has been raised by Christ the Lord to the dignity of a sacrament between the baptised.".
Mar 31, · Frum defended what was then the consensus conservative (and consensus national) position. , on Page SR11 of the New York edition with the .